ChallengerGary
Active Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2011
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 4
Looking at the forum headings, should this be for either "Pre-1981 trucks" or "up to 1980?" The body style changed in 1981 and my 1980 clearly belongs in this forum
Joey, I think it should be 87 on down because almost all of the parts from the 80's trucks swap directly over to the 72-80 trucks. Plus the trucks were still carburated at that time as well. An 85 Dodge D100 is almost the same as a 73 D100 aside from the grille and some interior pieces. The body lines are slightly different as well.
Whereas an 85 D100 is a totally different truck all together than a 95 RAM. I think the cutoff point should be when fuel injection came into play. That way the tech talk of the forums are consistant while some of the cosmetics may be different. Otherwise you'll be having guys asking about their 1bbl slant six in a forum with guys talking about brand new trucks.
Just my 2 cents :biggrin1:
You guys just have to make up my mind as to what you want the forum to be.
there is alot more difference from 1981+ body style compared to the 1972-1980 dodge trucks then what comes to sight from quick glance, fenders are different, cab roof is taller on 1981+ and shaped different. the noticable body line as you meationed on 1981+ and the tail lights and much more
Yeah but what I'm getting at is the fact that the mechanical parts of the truck are almost identical. You can swap engines, suspension, rear ends, transmissions etc etc and they'll bolt right up.
I'm more concerned with the mechanical side than whether or not the tail lights are different or whether the body lines don't match up perfect. It would kinda be like having separate forums for Dusters, Demons, Darts and Valiants over at FABO because they look different. Doesn't matter that they look different because a ton of the parts interchange so one question can be broadly answered by many people with many different years and models.
Like I said an 84 D100 is very similar to a 73 D100, yet has absolutely nothing in common with a 95 RAM. So why have it grouped in the same forum?
I vote 87 on down
I believe 81-93 is considered first gen Ram. Than 94-02 second gen and so on. So it would make sense in that regards to list it as pre 81.
x2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I might be late but why don't they just add more forums? There could be pre 81, first gen, second gen and third gen and everyone would be happy and shut up.
I might be late but why don't they just add more forums? There could be pre 81, first gen, second gen and third gen and everyone would be happy and shut up.