Summit part #rnb-264-233.Now it's listed for a 360 which I have but can't remember the difference in the 340 rear cap.Mhead. Where did you order the 91 V8 pan?? I have looked for 3 years as I have a 426 stroked 340 to go in my 93.
Summit part #rnb-264-233.Now it's listed for a 360 which I have but can't remember the difference in the 340 rear cap.Mhead. Where did you order the 91 V8 pan?? I have looked for 3 years as I have a 426 stroked 340 to go in my 93.
Ok let me give ya alittle more info. When the previous post said that a ford explorer rear was the way they were right you will have the same pattern as the 5 lug dakota and rear discs to STOP and makes big diff and all the brakes will hook up and you had the v6 so the frame mounts will work with tge spool type mounts but go to hypo tek and they have everything you need and if you want to pull the wheels they show a pic of there frame brace and these frames won't take doin that without help lolWell I'm back
I really like the looks of the regular cab shortbox. But up here, they are really, really hard to find.
Does anybody know if a regular box frame can easily be shortened?
Like what is the weight difference?
Can ladder bars overcome the handicap?
Is it worth it.
Btw,
I like the First gen bodies, but the second gen interiors.
Do the 5-lug rotors swap directly onto the 6-lug spindles?
Has anybody tried
swapping an A/B body K-member into a first gen Dakota. That would solve a few problems right?
I have a 73 A-body K.